Archive for category Uncategorized
Die Top 10 der relevantesten Social Media Dienste in Deutschland
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Executive Search Deutschland, Social Media, Uncategorized on July 26, 2010
- XING, Linkedin und Facebook sind in Deutschland die wichtigsten Social Media Dienste für Employee Recruitment
- Unter den Top 5 des Social Media Relevanz Monitors für die B2B-Kommunikation verbesserte sich Facebook auf Position 2.
Der von SF eBusiness entwickelte Social Media Relevanz Monitor – kurz SMR – wurde erneut auf Basis aktueller Daten für die B2B-Kommunikation ausgewertet. Über 80 Social Media Dienste wurden anhand von 30 Bewertungskriterien in eine Reihenfolge gebracht. Dadurch lassen sich ähnliche Social Media Dienste miteinander vergleichen. Diese Basisbewertung gibt Unternehmen eine erste Einschätzung über relevante Plattformen.
Der Social Media Relevanz Monitor wurde erstmals für den Bereich Employee Recruitment durchgeführt und liefert folgendes Ranking:
Die Top 10 der relevantesten Social Media Dienste für
Employee Recruitment in Deutschland; März 2010:
- XING (100 %)* – www.xing.com
- Linkedin (88 %) – www.linkedin.com
- Facebook (53 %) – www.facebook.com
- Twitter (50 %) – www.twitter.com
- StudiVZ (44 %) – www.studivz.net
- MeinVZ (39 %) – www.meinvz.net
- kununu (35 %) – www.kununu.de
- Ning (32 %) – www.ning.com
- YouTube (31 %) – www.youtube.com
- Wer-kennt-wen (29 %) – www.wer-kennt-wen.de
* Der Wert in Klammern gibt die Relevanz des jeweiligen Dienstes im Vergleich zum Erstplatzierten an.
Laut der aktuellen Studie des Social Media Monitors B2B (kurz SMR-B2B) sind XING, Linkedin und Facebook die wichtigsten Dienste für Employee Recruitment auf Social Media Diensten.
Die Business Netzwerke XING und Linkedin liegen erwartungsgemäß ganz vorne, das liegt auch daran, daß diese Plattformen speziell auf das Thema Employee Recruitment zugeschnitten sind.
Beste nicht rein Business-orientierte Dienste sind Facebook, Twitter und der zum Holtzbrinck Verlag gehörende Dienst StudiVZ
Die Top 5 der Social Media Dienste für den Einsatz in der
B2B-Kommunikation
Auch in der Top 5 der relevantesten Social Media Dienste für die allgemeine B2B-Kommunikation gab es eine Veränderung. So konnte sich das größte Social Network der Welt, Facebook, um eine Position von drei auf zwei verbessern. Das Business Social Network XING rutscht demnach um eine Position ab. Twitter und YouTube bleiben auf ihren bisherigen Positionen.
Die Top 5 der Social Media Dienste* für den Einsatz in der B2B-Kommunikation sind (weltweit):
- Linkedin.com (100 %)** – www.linkedin.com
- Facebook.com (98 %) – www.facebook.com
- Xing.com (97 %) – www.xing.com
- Twitter.com (82 %) – www.twitter.com
- YouTube (78 %) – www.youtube.com
* Auszug aus den Ergebnissen des Social Media Relevanz Monitors, Stand März 2010
** Der Wert in Klammern gibt die Relevanz des jeweiligen Dienstes im Vergleich zum Erstplatzierten an.
SF eBusiness stellt den „Social Media Relevanz Monitor B2B“ (SRM-B2B) Unternehmen zur Verfügung. Unternehmen können eine individuelle Priorisierung der Kriterien in einem Workshop an die Bedürfnisse des jeweiligen Geschäftsumfeldes anpassen. Somit entsteht ein auf das Unternehmen angepasstes Ranking und kann damit ein wichtiges Managementtool für effiziente Entscheidungen bezüglich des Budgeteinsatzes im Social Media Bereich darstellen.
Source: SF eBusiness GmbH
Focus and vision: the rise of Facebook
Posted by Frank Mortimer in CEO jobs, Social Media, Uncategorized on July 23, 2010
An interesting article on how a visionair like Zuckerberg shows restrained and keeps focusing on user value irrespective of a money driven environment and with that rises the stakes again and again.
C.O’ Brien: As incredible as it seems that Facebook has crossed the threshold of 500 million users in just six years, I find myself even more amazed at how the company reached this remarkable milestone.
This struck me recently as I was reading “The Facebook Effect,” the account of the company’s rise by technology reporter David Kirkpatrick. In pulling the various threads of Facebook’s story together, some known and some previously unknown, the book crystallized for me some important lessons from what has become one of the most remarkable business stories ever seen in Silicon Valley.
Facebook has joined the pantheon of the most important valley companies: Google, Apple, Oracle, Hewlett-Packard, Intel and Cisco.
Systems. Though it is far smaller than any of these in terms of revenue, its impact on society arguably rivals any of them.
And in large part that is due to the unshakable vision and leadership of its founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. Sure, he has made any number of missteps along the way, as you would expect from someone who is still only 26. But let’s appreciate the things he’s done right — often bucking the conventional wisdom and the advice of more experienced elders.
First among these was the decision by Zuckerberg to insist that Facebook focus on the user experience first and ignore the business side in the short run. In Kirkpatrick’s book, advertisers of all sorts were approaching Facebook’s sales teams early on,
offering to pay large sums for various ad schemes. But Zuckerberg turned many of them down — to the dismay of his sales team — because they would disrupt the look and feel of the Facebook experience.
Facebook’s apparent lack of a business model has been the butt of some easy jokes (until Twitter came along), but Zuckerberg was smart. The company is fine-tuning its advertising strategy, but in the meantime it has become such an unstoppable force on the Web that it can afford to take its time turning on the revenue spigot.
And the extraordinary treasure trove of personal information we’re volunteering to Facebook is inevitably going to turn into a gusher of advertising revenue that may one day be the envy of Google, which can only guess at who we are and what we want.
Another example of how Zuckerberg’s instincts have served the company well comes from the way the service itself has evolved. Many changes have been met with outrage from users and criticism from the press.
Rather than panic and try to placate critics, Zuckerberg has been able to look past the hue and cry in a way that shows he sometimes understands his users’ behavior better than they do.
The best example of this may have been the controversy over the introduction of the news feed in September 2006. When Facebook first launched, each user had a profile page. But if you wanted to see if someone had made changes or uploaded a new photo, you had to keep going back to that friend’s page to check for new content.
Zuckerberg conceived of the news feed to solve this. Now you would just have one stream of updates on all of your friends’ activity.
When this launched, users went ballistic. They decried the massive privacy invasion (even though no new information was being shared). People even started groups on Facebook to protest the news feed that quickly gained thousands of members.
But Zuckerberg recognized the viral nature of these protest groups was in fact made possible by the news feed they were protesting. And while he made some modest changes to the settings, he resisted pressure to switch it off.
Today, the news feed is an essential part of the Facebook experience and in large measure the reason for the site’s fantastic growth and the large chunks of time many of us spend there.
While Zuckerberg does have a strong sense of where this is all taking us, he does at time get ahead of his users. And he still needs to learn how to better manage the introduction of big changes so that they don’t cause massive user revolts. But even when he deserves criticism, no one can accuse him of being greedy.
Anyone who insists he’s doing any of this for the money is just flat-out wrong. When the site was just 2 years old, Yahoo offered to buy it for $1 billion. The site still had less than 12 million users and was far behind MySpace in the social networking world. Zuckerberg was being offered more than $1 billion for the company at a time when it was far from certain that it would be king of social networks. Zuckerberg, then just 22, still had control of the majority of the company and turned the offer down over the protests of some of his venture capitalists and executives.
Could you have turned down $1 billion when you were 22? When your company was a distant No. 2? No, you couldn’t have. But Zuckerberg did and still resists an IPO that would most likely make him a multibillionaire.
As we look ahead now and wonder if the company can reach 1 billion users, I would be more surprised if it didn’t. No one is going to come along and dislodge Facebook anytime soon. And for that, credit goes to Zuckerberg for the vision he showed in laying a rock-solid foundation on which to build a company poised to serve as the central nervous system of the Web for years to come.
Source: MercuriNews
Social media and recruiting
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Social Media, Uncategorized on June 6, 2010
Ok not much exitingly new in the article below but I do very much like the truth in this remark: ‘ Twitter is a cocktail party, Facebook to the office water cooler, and LinkedIn to a professional network; each with their place and each one important for the job seeker to navigate and master.”Being active and engaged is different than having a profile. It takes effort’
Natalie Paulson had just left a job she loved to seek out a new career challenge. But it didn’t take long for the Sacramento professional to find what the real challenge would be. “I didn’t want to become obsolete,” Paulson said. “My goal was to work for a company that was in social media.”
By using social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook, she was able to connect with people key to landing her next job, befriending the owner and others at the firm where she wanted to work. “When I interviewed, they knew who I was and were happy to see me,” she said. “It’s a simple strategy: How do I get to the people who make decisions.”
The strategy worked. Today, Paulson is director of business development for the Sacramento firm 3Fold Communications.
Paulson was among a panel of local professionals putting social media to work, the subject of a seminar last Tuesday for 60 job seekers, recruiters and others at the Sacramento co-working space Urban Hive.
The Sacramento Social Media Club hosted the seminar.
Asia Allen of Gravity Public Relations hopes social media tools can help her locate new talent and expand her client pool.
“I’m looking to expand my organization, but I’m also looking for opportunities,” Allen said. “Beyond a website, I need to give my business a human side to be able to talk to people. (With social media), they’re talking to my company, so it’s a very valuable tool.”
Increasingly, tools like Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn are becoming the new résumé, the panelists said, giving job seekers access to employers, and recruiters get a glimpse of potential hires.
“Companies are looking for specific individuals and their decisions have to be spot on,” said Curt Cetraro, chief executive officer of ConnectPoint Search Group, a Sacramento-based recruiting firm.
“Employers are overwhelmed by options, so they’ve started looking for people via social media,” he said. “If your profile is tailored that way, you’ll show up.” Job seekers can use the sites to sound the alarm that they are looking for a new opportunity and gain valuable feedback on whether their profile portrays them in their best light, said Christina Rogers, owner of Sacramento-based Angeles Career Consulting.
“If you’re looking for a job, tell everybody,” Rogers said. Also, ask what their impression is of you. You’re packaging yourself, so clean up your package,” Rogers said. That means reviewing “friends” you’ve collected online, reviewing photos and comments on your sites. Like a résumé, your site should be a professional document, Paulson of 3Fold said. “If you put out your brand, it’s really important to protect yourself,” Paulso said. “If you pick a tool, you should use it appropriately.”
Most important, though, is to embrace social media technology, said the Social Media Club’s Jeff Marmins.
He likens Twitter to a cocktail party, Facebook to the office water cooler, and LinkedIn to a professional network; each with their place and each one important for the job seeker to navigate and master.”Being active and engaged is different than having a profile. It takes effort,” he said. “Any way to stand out above the fray.
Source: The Sacramento Bee
Current Headhunter approach is out of date
Posted by Frank Mortimer in CEO jobs, Executive Search, Uncategorized on February 11, 2010
Finding a new chief executive or chairman has become a transactional process. The mechanics are well established but the search touches only a fraction of the available talent pool.
Unfortunately, today’s headhunters are professional interviewers who do not understand how chief executives work in practice. Top chief executives focus on winning by hiring strong leaders with the right personal qualities. In contrast, their headhunters rely too much on narrow job briefs. There are more fundamental, structural problems within the industry. Headhunting firms are staffed by highly experienced and dedicated professionals, but their incentivisation, approaches and leadership are out of date.
Individual search consultants earn low base salaries, with bonuses driven by the number of searches they sell and execute. This means that they are heavily incentivised to get as many searches done as quickly as possible. Ideally, a client would want a search across as many geographies and industries as possible. In contrast, consultants cut their own pay if they share the work widely with other partners.
With a pressure to transact searches, and client relationships in the hands of individuals and not firms, knowledge growth is slow, built case by case. What they should do is proactively identify the best leaders and emerging leaders wherever they are in the world. Search consultants typically charge a third of the successful candidate’s estimated first-year package, irrespective of whether the chief executive search is successful. It is not surprising that clients hate this.
The search industry must move towards much lower retainers, a success fee for completed searches and far more significant upside if they place a highly successful boss.
We need firms that understand the different types of chief and how they work. A winning firm is a proactive talent scout constantly building a base of the best global leaders.
It transacts fantastically still, but now shares richly in success and is not paid for failure.
We need to move from a passion for clients and fees to a passion for clients and global leaders and a firm belief that fees follow good work. Imagine, a headhunting firm that clients love and employees are proud to be part of and whose candidates create the next generation of global companies. What a prospect.
Extraction of an article by S. Tappin, The Times.
How recruiters select headhunters
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Executive Search, Finding A Headhunter, Uncategorized on February 7, 2010
How recruiters select headhunters, tells you a lot about how headhunters and recruiters from larger companies select candidates. De following a list of questions recruiters are suggested to use to select a headhunter. Bear in mind that the list is made by a headhunter from Signium international.
1. What is your firm’s industry focuses – who are some of your current clients?
This determining factor allows a hiring organization to assess a firm’s market and functional knowledge relevant to their specific situation and need. One must have confidence that the consultant knows where to look for the top talent, and how to engage and recruit them. This confidence will support a cohesive and functional client/consultant relationship throughout the course of the project.
2. Who will be doing the work; how is your firm structured?
Given the consultative nature of search, it is critical to determine how involved and engaged the lead consultant will be during the course of the project. Will the consultant who sells or ‘pitches’ the assignment do the majority of the work? Is the research and candidate development conducted in-house, or outsourced to a third party? Does the firm have the appropriate project management and communication tools to ensure timely and accurate feedback? Who, exactly, will be accountable for your specific project?
3. How many searches does the consultant handle simultaneously?
Here is a good question to ask as a follow up to the previous discussion. A consultant handling over six or seven projects at one time is average. You need to be comfortable that your project is going to receive the time and attention needed to be a success.
4. What percentages of searches are successfully completed? Is there a guarantee should the placement fail?
The industry average for completing projects is between 65% and 70%. This is partially a result of cases when specifications and/or business conditions change, organizations restructure, or the skill set you seek does not exist. While there are many variables that can affect this number, a reliable number should be in the 75% – 90% range. The key here is to be wary of the consultant who tells you that they have a 100% completion rate. This is not realistic!
Most firms offer at least a one year replacement guarantee, and will replace a candidate who does not work out for expenses only.
5. What are the timing and key milestones of the process?
In most cases, executive level searches take between 90 and 150 days to complete. Most professional and competent firms/consultants will be able to provide you a well defined and detailed outline of their process and timeline. Typically, you should expect a detailed progress review, including a list of pre screened and qualified candidate backgrounds between weeks four and six, and begin to see candidates face to face between weeks six and eight.
Note: Often times searches are lengthened because of candidate availability and scheduling conflicts, especially for those candidates currently employed.
6. What are the firms current “off limits,” i.e., where is a firm blocked from recruiting candidates based on existing client relationships?
This is a critical question to ask either large firms with specialty practice groups, or smaller firms focused on specific functions or market sectors. Firms typically cannot recruit from an existing client for one to two years after an assignment. If a large number of target companies (those where the majority of potential candidates are currently employed) are blocked, your ability to access a strong candidate pool could be severely limited.
You must also ensure that there is agreement with your chosen firm as to the length of time they may not recruit from your organization. Be careful not to let the fox into the hen house.
7. How is candidate quality assured?
The lead consultant needs to have a clear understanding of the performance metrics and evaluation tools that will be used by you and your organization to judge candidates. It is important to have confidence in their abilities to understand both your organization’s culture and the scope and requirements of the position to be filled. The search consultant must function as your agent in the market to both engage and recruit the best available talent. They must have the ability to recruit the best candidate for the job, not the best candidate looking for a job.
8. How and when are references conducted?
This has continually been a key issue and one that is fraught with pitfalls. Consultants must be able to reach beyond just career history and focus references on discussing competency, character and potential. References should be sequenced into the process. We recommend that at least two are done before you decide on a final candidate. This will go a long way in eliminating the possibility of costly and potentially embarrassing problems later in the process! Final references should be checked with a combination of supervisors, peers, and subordinates, and with individuals other than those provided by the candidate. Keep in mind that while you may want to do ‘backdoor’ references yourself, in order to protect a candidate’s privacy, all references should be coordinated through your search consultant.
9. What is the firm’s role in candidate negotiations and closing?
This is a crucial step in the recruitment process, one in which a professional search consultant should be both comfortable and experienced. He/she must be able to effectively negotiate and communicate with both parties to achieve successful outcomes.
10. What are fees and expenses?
Retained firms typically bill between 30% and 33% of a candidate’s first years total cash compensation, paid in three equal installments over the first three months of a search. Most firms bill you for all expenses directly attributable to conducting the search, and some firm’s bill for non-itemized, or communication expenses. Upon request, firms may agree to a flat fee, or a discount based on volume of work. In some cases, firms will tie the timing of their invoices to their successfully attaining specific stage gates during the search process, including linking a portion of the professional fee to the completion of the assignment.
11. Is your firm accredited, are you a member of an Industry Association?
There are several key industry associations for retained Executive Search Firms, the most visible and important being the AESC (Association of Executive Search Consultants). AESC members comprise an elite group of top tiered retained Executive Search Firms. All members agree to abide by the Associations Code of Ethics and Professional Practice Guidelines, and meet strict membership criteria. Membership in the AESC is the only form of quality accreditation that exists for retained executive search consulting. The other key organization is the IACPR (International Association for Corporate & Professional Recruitment) whose mission is to provide the senior-level recruitment community with opportunities to network, share best practices and build cutting-edge expertise within a collaborative environment, and whose members are comprised of both corporate recruiters and executive search consultants
IT and Cleantech hot growth sectors in 2010?
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Executive Search, Uncategorized on January 19, 2010
Polachi, a provider of Access Executive Search™ services to technology, clean tech, venture capital and private equity clients released its top trend predictions for executive recruiting in 2010. As the economy pulls out of a recession, the job market is changing with information technology and clean technology gaining speed.
Although the job market will take time to stabilize, the economy is turning and economists are optimistic about 2010. “At Polachi, we have taken aggressive steps to meet the anticipated demands. We recently added Sean Carroll as a Partner based in the New York metropolitan area, specializing in situating C-level technology executives in the software, digital media and technology enabled services sectors,” said Peter Polachi, Partner.
Information Technology and Clean Technology Sectors To Grow: As 2010 approaches, there will be significant growth in the clean technology and information technology sectors. With an increasing demand for C-level executives in technology and a shortage of talent, there are a number of opportunities. “Since Labor Day, we have seen a dramatic increase at the executive level in start-ups to publically traded companies in the information technology and clean technology sectors”, said Charley Polachi, Partner.
New demand for a Chief Sustainability Officer – The new Environmental Chief: President Obama’s administration is dedicating a substantial amount of money towards energy efficiency. Polachi believes that based on this major push for corporations to become more green that companies will have the need to create a new executive level position for a Chief Sustainability Officer. According to Jim Poe, Partner, “In the next 5 years the demand for a CSO will dramatically accelerate as companies will need a CSO who is accountable to both the owner and share holders.”
Diversity at Larger Companies: “All companies are especially putting on a big push for diversity,” says Brigid Siegel, Partner. “They recognize that having a more multicultural representation leads to improved products and services for the ever-expanding minority and international markets.”
Innovation is key ingredient: Innovation is vital to today’s economy as it will create business, and in turn create jobs. “We see with our west coast clients that the west coast is climbing a little bit quicker than the east coast, but the tech market is gaining a lot of strength at the executive level in both general management and sales,” said Charley Polachi.
Decline in Venture Capital: As the economy rounds the corner, the 2010 executive job market will see a shift. “Although there is still money to be made in Venture Capital, it will not be at the same rate we have historically seen,” adds Rebecca Foreman Janjic, Partner.
Global Interest from PE Industry: “An increasing number of private equity firms will progressively seek international exposure,” said Karen Burke D’Agostino, Partner. “There is a particularly high level of interest in China and India. We are well positioned to address these levels of interest through our Access Search Partners™ partnership.”
Overall, the Polachi team remains bullish on demand for high caliber executives across all of its practice area sectors.
Polachi. December ‘09
Waarom totaljobs stopt in Nederland
Posted by Robert Jan Veenstra in Uncategorized on November 24, 2009
Een vervolg op de eerdere melding. Hieronder een wat uitgebreidere beschrijving van de achtergronden:
Totaljobs had zich sinds 2004 in korte tijd van challenger tot één van de grote vacaturesites in Nederland ontwikkeld. Maar het ambitieniveau van deze joint venture tussen Totaljobs Group (TG) en Reed Business (RB) lag aanzienlijk hoger: een nummer 1 of 2 positie in de Nederlandse markt.
Dat betekent dus minstens Monsterboard of Nationale Vacaturebank achter je laten. En het liefst allebei…
Om een dergelijke positie te bereiken is een goed functionerende vacaturesite niet voldoende. In zo’n geval is het nodig om ook zwaar in te zetten op marketing. Een onderdeel waar Totaljobs bijzonder weinig aan had gedaan; zeker in vergelijking met Monsterboard en Nationale Vacaturebank.
Ironisch genoeg was 2008 het jaar waarop Totaljobs de aanval zou gaan openen op haar twee grootste concurrenten. Een logische gedachte gezien de op dat moment zeer sterke positie van de site; op basis van het marktaandeel (aantallen nieuwe vacatures):
Marktaandeel Nationale Vacaturebank, Totaljobs, Monsterboard, Q2 2008 – Q2 2009
Het was de bedoeling om in de tweede helft van 2008 onder andere via TV commercials de naamsbekendheid van Totaljobs aanzienlijk te vergroten. Maar met het uitbreken van de economische crisis werd besloten de commercials voorlopig te schrappen.
Als gevolg van de negatieve resultaatontwikkeling over 2009 is besloten de aanval op de koppositie maar helemaal te vergeten. Met als consequentie dat er voor Totaljobs.nl in haar huidige vorm niet langer een plaats is binnen Reed Elsevier.
In de afgelopen periode is gezocht naar alternatieven, maar geen van de opties is blijkbaar als levensvatbaar ingeschat. Waarmee ook een continuering in een andere vorm werd uitgesloten.
En daarmee komt een einde aan het relatief korte bestaan van Totaljobs in Nederland. Eind 2004 werd de site gelanceerd, eind 2009 wordt het licht alweer uitgedaan.
De concurrenten zullen vanzelfsprekend opgelucht ademhalen. RB is in potentie een zeer geduchte tegenstander met enkele sterke merken. Maar zij heeft zich nu vrijwillig uit het strijdperk terug getrokken. Met als gevolg een kapitaal- en kennisvernietiging binnen een bedrijf dat online business als strategisch heeft bestempeld…
VNU Media (Nationale Vacaturebank) en Monster Worldwide Inc. zijn evenmin kleine bedrijven. Hun focus op de online recruitment markt is echter sterker gebleken dan die van RB. Met op dit moment als beloning een braakliggend lapje markt waar voorheen Totaljobs gevestigd was. De één zijn dood is de ander zijn brood.
Formeel is nog onduidelijk wat er met Totaljobs Duitsland gaat gebeuren. Maar deze site is eigenlijk al maanden een spookstad en zal ongetwijfeld hetzelfde lot beschoren zijn. Wat het einde betekent van de Europese ambities van TG buiten de UK. Waarmee ze ineens weer een ‘lokale’ speler is geworden.
Het zou me daarom niets verbazen wanneer TG als gevolg daarvan ineens een interessante overname kandidaat is geworden. Zelfs los van de plannen die Reed Elsevier heeft met RB. De komende periode wordt mogelijk erg spannend voor TG.
Bron: lettelijk overgenomen van recruitmentmatters.nl, 21 November 2009
Totaljobs trekt zich terug uit Nederland
Posted by Robert Jan Veenstra in Uncategorized on November 18, 2009
Zojuist ontvangen. Een onderdeel van een bericht verschenen op het intranet van Reed Business over totaljobs.nl, de huidige nr 3 vacaturesite in Nederland:
————————-
De directie van de Totaljobs Group Ltd in Londen heeft het voornemen om de Nederlandse activiteiten – Totaljobs.nl – te staken.
Door de economische recessie zijn de omstandigheden voor Totaljobs.nl sterk verslechterd. Het resultaat zal in 2009 negatief zijn, en de vooruitzichten voor de langere termijn zijn ongunstig. Het voornemen is om Totaljobs.nl per 1 januari 2010 te staken.
“Totaljobs.nl heeft een sterk product en bevlogen medewerkers. De uitdaging was in de afgelopen jaren om in Nederland een schaalgrootte te bereiken die bescherming biedt tegen het negatieve effect van de economische cycli en een optimale opbrengst brengt bij een opgaande economie. Het product is echter verliesgevend en er is nog een te substantiële investering nodig om in de komende jaren de gewenste nummer een of twee positie te bereiken tussen de generieke vacaturesites in Nederland. We hebben in de afgelopen maanden de verschillende opties bekeken en de eindconclusie is dat er geen bevredigend alternatief is gevonden”, aldus Olivier van Duijn, Director Europe van de Totaljobs Group.
———————
Een nogal bijzonder besluit, de uitgangspunten lijken op dit moment juist goed voor online recruitment. Je vraagt je af wat de onderliggende online strategie van Reed Business eigenlijk is. Ze lijken geen enkele investering meer te kunnen te doen. Wordt vast vervolgd..
Achieving your childhood dreams
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Interviews, Uncategorized on August 26, 2009
An important part of moving ahead and growing your career is to be very conscious of what it is that you really want and then knowing how to pursue it. One of the best and certainly the most moving lecture I’ve ever seen on this subject is by Randy Pausch.
Essentially it is a lecture by a man who knows he is only a couple months away from his death and has only the truth to tell you. Very touching and very educating.

Randolph Frederick “Randy” Pausch (October 23, 1960 – July 25, 2008) was an American professor of computer science and human-computer interaction and design at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pausch learned that he had pancreatic cancer, a terminal illness, in September of 2006. In September 2007 he gave an lecture entitled “The Last Lecture: Really Achieving Your Childhood Dreams” at Carnegie Mellon. The lecture became a hit on YouTube. He then co-authored a book called The Last Lecture on the same theme, which became a New York Times best-seller. Pausch died of complications from pancreatic cancer in July, 2008.
Click on this link:
The Lintberg Index: What are your chances for a 100k+ job
Posted by Frank Mortimer in 100K+ job index, CEO jobs, Executive Search, Finding A Headhunter, Uncategorized on August 17, 2009
With courtesy of Lintberg, as of this month we will publish the monthly Lintberg Index of the Netherlands on Huntedhead.com
The Lintberg Index is a monthly analysis of developments in the top 2% of the labour market
The index is a weighted index based on the number of running vacancies, the number of new vacancies, the positions advertising period and the total the number of application on Euro100K+ jobs in the Netherlands based on the input of the market leader Lintberg (www.lintberg.com). A higher index indicates an improved labour market for professionals in the 100k+ segment.
The Lintberg Index for July is 86, risen from 83 in June.
This indicates only a slight improvement compared to June but does show that the growth since the very low April index (63) seems stable.




Comments