Posts Tagged Recruiters
Die Top 10 der relevantesten Social Media Dienste in Deutschland
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Executive Search Deutschland, Social Media, Uncategorized on July 26, 2010
- XING, Linkedin und Facebook sind in Deutschland die wichtigsten Social Media Dienste für Employee Recruitment
- Unter den Top 5 des Social Media Relevanz Monitors für die B2B-Kommunikation verbesserte sich Facebook auf Position 2.
Der von SF eBusiness entwickelte Social Media Relevanz Monitor – kurz SMR – wurde erneut auf Basis aktueller Daten für die B2B-Kommunikation ausgewertet. Über 80 Social Media Dienste wurden anhand von 30 Bewertungskriterien in eine Reihenfolge gebracht. Dadurch lassen sich ähnliche Social Media Dienste miteinander vergleichen. Diese Basisbewertung gibt Unternehmen eine erste Einschätzung über relevante Plattformen.
Der Social Media Relevanz Monitor wurde erstmals für den Bereich Employee Recruitment durchgeführt und liefert folgendes Ranking:
Die Top 10 der relevantesten Social Media Dienste für
Employee Recruitment in Deutschland; März 2010:
- XING (100 %)* – www.xing.com
- Linkedin (88 %) – www.linkedin.com
- Facebook (53 %) – www.facebook.com
- Twitter (50 %) – www.twitter.com
- StudiVZ (44 %) – www.studivz.net
- MeinVZ (39 %) – www.meinvz.net
- kununu (35 %) – www.kununu.de
- Ning (32 %) – www.ning.com
- YouTube (31 %) – www.youtube.com
- Wer-kennt-wen (29 %) – www.wer-kennt-wen.de
* Der Wert in Klammern gibt die Relevanz des jeweiligen Dienstes im Vergleich zum Erstplatzierten an.
Laut der aktuellen Studie des Social Media Monitors B2B (kurz SMR-B2B) sind XING, Linkedin und Facebook die wichtigsten Dienste für Employee Recruitment auf Social Media Diensten.
Die Business Netzwerke XING und Linkedin liegen erwartungsgemäß ganz vorne, das liegt auch daran, daß diese Plattformen speziell auf das Thema Employee Recruitment zugeschnitten sind.
Beste nicht rein Business-orientierte Dienste sind Facebook, Twitter und der zum Holtzbrinck Verlag gehörende Dienst StudiVZ
Die Top 5 der Social Media Dienste für den Einsatz in der
B2B-Kommunikation
Auch in der Top 5 der relevantesten Social Media Dienste für die allgemeine B2B-Kommunikation gab es eine Veränderung. So konnte sich das größte Social Network der Welt, Facebook, um eine Position von drei auf zwei verbessern. Das Business Social Network XING rutscht demnach um eine Position ab. Twitter und YouTube bleiben auf ihren bisherigen Positionen.
Die Top 5 der Social Media Dienste* für den Einsatz in der B2B-Kommunikation sind (weltweit):
- Linkedin.com (100 %)** – www.linkedin.com
- Facebook.com (98 %) – www.facebook.com
- Xing.com (97 %) – www.xing.com
- Twitter.com (82 %) – www.twitter.com
- YouTube (78 %) – www.youtube.com
* Auszug aus den Ergebnissen des Social Media Relevanz Monitors, Stand März 2010
** Der Wert in Klammern gibt die Relevanz des jeweiligen Dienstes im Vergleich zum Erstplatzierten an.
SF eBusiness stellt den „Social Media Relevanz Monitor B2B“ (SRM-B2B) Unternehmen zur Verfügung. Unternehmen können eine individuelle Priorisierung der Kriterien in einem Workshop an die Bedürfnisse des jeweiligen Geschäftsumfeldes anpassen. Somit entsteht ein auf das Unternehmen angepasstes Ranking und kann damit ein wichtiges Managementtool für effiziente Entscheidungen bezüglich des Budgeteinsatzes im Social Media Bereich darstellen.
Source: SF eBusiness GmbH
Social media and recruiting
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Social Media, Uncategorized on June 6, 2010
Ok not much exitingly new in the article below but I do very much like the truth in this remark: ‘ Twitter is a cocktail party, Facebook to the office water cooler, and LinkedIn to a professional network; each with their place and each one important for the job seeker to navigate and master.”Being active and engaged is different than having a profile. It takes effort’
Natalie Paulson had just left a job she loved to seek out a new career challenge. But it didn’t take long for the Sacramento professional to find what the real challenge would be. “I didn’t want to become obsolete,” Paulson said. “My goal was to work for a company that was in social media.”
By using social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook, she was able to connect with people key to landing her next job, befriending the owner and others at the firm where she wanted to work. “When I interviewed, they knew who I was and were happy to see me,” she said. “It’s a simple strategy: How do I get to the people who make decisions.”
The strategy worked. Today, Paulson is director of business development for the Sacramento firm 3Fold Communications.
Paulson was among a panel of local professionals putting social media to work, the subject of a seminar last Tuesday for 60 job seekers, recruiters and others at the Sacramento co-working space Urban Hive.
The Sacramento Social Media Club hosted the seminar.
Asia Allen of Gravity Public Relations hopes social media tools can help her locate new talent and expand her client pool.
“I’m looking to expand my organization, but I’m also looking for opportunities,” Allen said. “Beyond a website, I need to give my business a human side to be able to talk to people. (With social media), they’re talking to my company, so it’s a very valuable tool.”
Increasingly, tools like Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn are becoming the new résumé, the panelists said, giving job seekers access to employers, and recruiters get a glimpse of potential hires.
“Companies are looking for specific individuals and their decisions have to be spot on,” said Curt Cetraro, chief executive officer of ConnectPoint Search Group, a Sacramento-based recruiting firm.
“Employers are overwhelmed by options, so they’ve started looking for people via social media,” he said. “If your profile is tailored that way, you’ll show up.” Job seekers can use the sites to sound the alarm that they are looking for a new opportunity and gain valuable feedback on whether their profile portrays them in their best light, said Christina Rogers, owner of Sacramento-based Angeles Career Consulting.
“If you’re looking for a job, tell everybody,” Rogers said. Also, ask what their impression is of you. You’re packaging yourself, so clean up your package,” Rogers said. That means reviewing “friends” you’ve collected online, reviewing photos and comments on your sites. Like a résumé, your site should be a professional document, Paulson of 3Fold said. “If you put out your brand, it’s really important to protect yourself,” Paulso said. “If you pick a tool, you should use it appropriately.”
Most important, though, is to embrace social media technology, said the Social Media Club’s Jeff Marmins.
He likens Twitter to a cocktail party, Facebook to the office water cooler, and LinkedIn to a professional network; each with their place and each one important for the job seeker to navigate and master.”Being active and engaged is different than having a profile. It takes effort,” he said. “Any way to stand out above the fray.
Source: The Sacramento Bee
How recruiters select headhunters
Posted by Frank Mortimer in Executive Search, Finding A Headhunter, Uncategorized on February 7, 2010
How recruiters select headhunters, tells you a lot about how headhunters and recruiters from larger companies select candidates. De following a list of questions recruiters are suggested to use to select a headhunter. Bear in mind that the list is made by a headhunter from Signium international.
1. What is your firm’s industry focuses – who are some of your current clients?
This determining factor allows a hiring organization to assess a firm’s market and functional knowledge relevant to their specific situation and need. One must have confidence that the consultant knows where to look for the top talent, and how to engage and recruit them. This confidence will support a cohesive and functional client/consultant relationship throughout the course of the project.
2. Who will be doing the work; how is your firm structured?
Given the consultative nature of search, it is critical to determine how involved and engaged the lead consultant will be during the course of the project. Will the consultant who sells or ‘pitches’ the assignment do the majority of the work? Is the research and candidate development conducted in-house, or outsourced to a third party? Does the firm have the appropriate project management and communication tools to ensure timely and accurate feedback? Who, exactly, will be accountable for your specific project?
3. How many searches does the consultant handle simultaneously?
Here is a good question to ask as a follow up to the previous discussion. A consultant handling over six or seven projects at one time is average. You need to be comfortable that your project is going to receive the time and attention needed to be a success.
4. What percentages of searches are successfully completed? Is there a guarantee should the placement fail?
The industry average for completing projects is between 65% and 70%. This is partially a result of cases when specifications and/or business conditions change, organizations restructure, or the skill set you seek does not exist. While there are many variables that can affect this number, a reliable number should be in the 75% – 90% range. The key here is to be wary of the consultant who tells you that they have a 100% completion rate. This is not realistic!
Most firms offer at least a one year replacement guarantee, and will replace a candidate who does not work out for expenses only.
5. What are the timing and key milestones of the process?
In most cases, executive level searches take between 90 and 150 days to complete. Most professional and competent firms/consultants will be able to provide you a well defined and detailed outline of their process and timeline. Typically, you should expect a detailed progress review, including a list of pre screened and qualified candidate backgrounds between weeks four and six, and begin to see candidates face to face between weeks six and eight.
Note: Often times searches are lengthened because of candidate availability and scheduling conflicts, especially for those candidates currently employed.
6. What are the firms current “off limits,” i.e., where is a firm blocked from recruiting candidates based on existing client relationships?
This is a critical question to ask either large firms with specialty practice groups, or smaller firms focused on specific functions or market sectors. Firms typically cannot recruit from an existing client for one to two years after an assignment. If a large number of target companies (those where the majority of potential candidates are currently employed) are blocked, your ability to access a strong candidate pool could be severely limited.
You must also ensure that there is agreement with your chosen firm as to the length of time they may not recruit from your organization. Be careful not to let the fox into the hen house.
7. How is candidate quality assured?
The lead consultant needs to have a clear understanding of the performance metrics and evaluation tools that will be used by you and your organization to judge candidates. It is important to have confidence in their abilities to understand both your organization’s culture and the scope and requirements of the position to be filled. The search consultant must function as your agent in the market to both engage and recruit the best available talent. They must have the ability to recruit the best candidate for the job, not the best candidate looking for a job.
8. How and when are references conducted?
This has continually been a key issue and one that is fraught with pitfalls. Consultants must be able to reach beyond just career history and focus references on discussing competency, character and potential. References should be sequenced into the process. We recommend that at least two are done before you decide on a final candidate. This will go a long way in eliminating the possibility of costly and potentially embarrassing problems later in the process! Final references should be checked with a combination of supervisors, peers, and subordinates, and with individuals other than those provided by the candidate. Keep in mind that while you may want to do ‘backdoor’ references yourself, in order to protect a candidate’s privacy, all references should be coordinated through your search consultant.
9. What is the firm’s role in candidate negotiations and closing?
This is a crucial step in the recruitment process, one in which a professional search consultant should be both comfortable and experienced. He/she must be able to effectively negotiate and communicate with both parties to achieve successful outcomes.
10. What are fees and expenses?
Retained firms typically bill between 30% and 33% of a candidate’s first years total cash compensation, paid in three equal installments over the first three months of a search. Most firms bill you for all expenses directly attributable to conducting the search, and some firm’s bill for non-itemized, or communication expenses. Upon request, firms may agree to a flat fee, or a discount based on volume of work. In some cases, firms will tie the timing of their invoices to their successfully attaining specific stage gates during the search process, including linking a portion of the professional fee to the completion of the assignment.
11. Is your firm accredited, are you a member of an Industry Association?
There are several key industry associations for retained Executive Search Firms, the most visible and important being the AESC (Association of Executive Search Consultants). AESC members comprise an elite group of top tiered retained Executive Search Firms. All members agree to abide by the Associations Code of Ethics and Professional Practice Guidelines, and meet strict membership criteria. Membership in the AESC is the only form of quality accreditation that exists for retained executive search consulting. The other key organization is the IACPR (International Association for Corporate & Professional Recruitment) whose mission is to provide the senior-level recruitment community with opportunities to network, share best practices and build cutting-edge expertise within a collaborative environment, and whose members are comprised of both corporate recruiters and executive search consultants


Comments